Item has been added

Get 20% off!arrow_drop_up

Why More Probiotic Strains Beat MCC-Filled Options Every Time

  • person My Store Admin
  • calendar_today
  • comment 0 comments
Why More Probiotic Strains Beat MCC-Filled Options Every Time

Why Multi-Strain Probiotics Without MCC Outperform Traditional Supplements Every Time

When selecting a probiotic supplement, the capsule material and formulation additives may be just as critical as the bacterial strains themselves. Most commercial probiotics contain microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)—a wood-derived filler that research increasingly suggests may interfere with the very benefits you're seeking. Emerging evidence indicates that multi-strain probiotic formulations free from MCC and other problematic fillers deliver superior colonization, enhanced therapeutic outcomes, and comprehensive gut microbiome support compared to conventional alternatives.

This evidence-based analysis examines why strain diversity matters, how MCC impacts probiotic efficacy, and why advanced formulations like MicroBiome Restore—featuring 26 clinically-studied strains, soil-based organisms, organic prebiotics, and fermented capsule technology—represent the next generation of gut health supplementation. Drawing from peer-reviewed research published in leading gastroenterology and microbiology journals, we'll explore the science behind optimal probiotic delivery and formulation.

Key Research Findings

  • Strain diversity amplifies therapeutic benefits: Multi-strain formulations demonstrate synergistic effects not achievable with single-strain products, with clinical trials showing 20-40% greater symptom reduction in IBS patients.1,2
  • MCC is metabolically inert: While "generally recognized as safe," microcrystalline cellulose provides zero nutritional value to gut bacteria and may reduce probiotic bioavailability by creating physical barriers.3,4
  • Cellulose particle size determines prebiotic effect: Research demonstrates that reducing cellulose to nanometric scale significantly enhances its fermentability by gut microbiota, while standard MCC remains largely non-fermentable.5
  • Soil-based organisms offer unique advantages: Bacillus species produce protective spores that survive stomach acid, colonize effectively, and produce beneficial metabolites traditional probiotics cannot.6,7
  • Prebiotic synergy maximizes colonization: Combining probiotics with organic prebiotics like Jerusalem artichoke inulin increases Bifidobacterium populations by 15-25% and enhances SCFA production.8,9

The Hidden Problem: How MCC Undermines Probiotic Effectiveness

Microcrystalline cellulose serves as an inexpensive manufacturing aid—a flow agent and binding material that makes pills easier to produce at scale. However, its convenience for manufacturers may come at a cost to consumers. As a non-fermentable fiber, MCC passes through the digestive system essentially unchanged, providing no nutritional support for the beneficial bacteria you're trying to cultivate.10

A landmark 2022 clinical trial published in Microbiome compared fermentable corn bran arabinoxylan with non-fermentable microcrystalline cellulose in overweight adults. While arabinoxylan enhanced satiety and decreased insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), MCC showed minimal metabolic benefits despite being consumed at identical doses (25-35g daily). Crucially, the fermentable fiber promoted beneficial gut bacteria growth and short-chain fatty acid production, whereas MCC did not.11

Critical Insight: Research indicates that MCC's hygroscopic properties (moisture absorption) can affect moisture-sensitive probiotic strains during storage and may create physical barriers that impede bacterial adhesion to intestinal walls—a crucial step for colonization and therapeutic action.12

The Absorption Interference Mechanism

Several studies have documented how insoluble, non-fermentable fibers can interfere with nutrient absorption and probiotic function:

  • Moisture competition: MCC's high water-binding capacity may deprive probiotic bacteria of the hydration needed to remain viable during storage and reactivation in the gut.13
  • Physical barrier effects: Cellulose particles can create a matrix that slows the release and dispersal of probiotics in the intestinal environment, potentially reducing colonization efficiency.14
  • Zero prebiotic benefit: Unlike fermentable fibers that feed beneficial bacteria, standard MCC cannot be metabolized by human gut microbiota to produce health-promoting short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) like butyrate, acetate, and propionate.15

A 2003 study in FEMS Microbiology Ecology found that microcrystalline cellulose-degrading bacteria could only be detected in 40% of human subjects studied—specifically those who were methane excretors. This suggests that most people lack the specialized gut bacteria needed to derive any benefit from MCC, making it a truly inert filler for the majority of consumers.16

Experience the MCC-Free Difference

MicroBiome Restore delivers 26 probiotic strains without microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, or other problematic fillers—just pure, science-backed gut support.

Discover MicroBiome Restore

Why Multi-Strain Diversity Outperforms Single-Strain Formulations

The human gut microbiome comprises an estimated 38 trillion microorganisms representing hundreds of bacterial species.17 This extraordinary diversity isn't accidental—it's essential for resilient digestive health, robust immune function, and metabolic balance. Single-strain probiotics, while potentially beneficial for specific conditions, cannot replicate this ecological complexity.

The Synergy Principle

A comprehensive 2021 review published in Biomolecules examined the mechanisms by which multi-strain probiotics exert enhanced biological activities. The researchers identified several synergistic interactions:18

🛡️ Complementary Pathogen Inhibition

Different strains target different pathogenic organisms through varied antimicrobial compounds (bacteriocins, organic acids, hydrogen peroxide), providing broader-spectrum protection than single strains.19

🔧 Enhanced Colonization

Multiple strains can occupy different ecological niches within the gastrointestinal tract, from the small intestine to various colon regions, maximizing therapeutic coverage.20

⚡ Metabolic Cooperation

Some strains produce metabolites that other strains utilize, creating cross-feeding networks that strengthen the entire probiotic community and enhance SCFA production.21

🎯 Immune Modulation

Different strains interact with distinct immune receptors, providing more comprehensive immune training and regulation than single-strain approaches.22

Clinical Evidence: A 2018 randomized controlled trial involving 400 patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS found that a 14-strain probiotic formulation (Bio-Kult®) reduced abdominal pain severity by 69% compared to 47% with placebo (p < 0.001)—representing a 145-point reduction on the IBS Severity Scoring System.23

Strain-Specific vs. Community-Level Effects

While it's true that probiotic effects are strain-specific (not all Lactobacillus species perform identically), the evidence increasingly supports biodiversity as a therapeutic strategy. A 2020 systematic review comparing single-strain and multi-strain probiotics across eight disease indications found that while single strains were equivalent to mixtures in some cases, multi-strain formulations showed superior efficacy for:

  • Helicobacter pylori eradication (when combining L. rhamnosus GG with B. lactis Bb12)24
  • Irritable bowel syndrome symptom management25
  • Functional constipation in elderly populations26
  • Metabolic syndrome parameters in type 2 diabetes27

Importantly, the review found no evidence of antagonistic interactions between strains in multi-strain products, dispelling earlier concerns about competitive inhibition.28

MicroBiome Restore supplement showing 26 probiotic strains organized by category: Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, and Bacillus species

The MicroBiome Restore Advantage: 26 Strains, Zero Fillers

MicroBiome Restore represents a paradigm shift in probiotic supplementation—combining cutting-edge research on strain diversity with uncompromising formulation purity. Here's what sets it apart:

Comprehensive Strain Profile

The formulation includes 26 clinically-studied strains spanning seven bacterial genera, providing unprecedented coverage across the entire gastrointestinal tract:

Bacterial Category Representative Strains Primary Benefits
Bifidobacterium Species
(5 strains)		 B. bifidum, B. breve, B. infantis, B. lactis, B. longum Infant gut colonization, immune development, vitamin synthesis, pathogen resistance29
Lactobacillus Species
(13 strains)		 L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, L. gasseri, L. casei, L. reuteri, others Lactose digestion, vaginal health, weight management, immune modulation30,31
Soil-Based Organisms
(5 Bacillus strains)		 B. coagulans, B. subtilis, B. clausii, B. licheniformis, B. pumilus Spore protection, antibiotic resilience, SIBO management, protein digestion32
Supporting Strains
(3 strains)		 Enterococcus faecium, Lactococcus lactis, Pediococcus acidilactici, others Intestinal barrier repair, fermentation capacity, competitive exclusion33

Spotlight: Why Soil-Based Organisms Matter

Soil-based organisms (SBOs) like Bacillus species represent an often-overlooked category of probiotics with unique advantages. These hardy microorganisms naturally form protective spores that:

  • Survive stomach acid completely: Unlike traditional probiotics that may lose 50-60% viability in gastric conditions, Bacillus spores arrive 100% intact in the intestines.34
  • Require no refrigeration: Spore structure provides inherent stability, maintaining potency at room temperature for extended periods.35
  • Colonize effectively: Studies show Bacillus subtilis can colonize the gut and produce beneficial compounds without displacing resident beneficial bacteria.36
  • Support SIBO management: Research indicates soil-based probiotics may help with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth where traditional Lactobacillus strains sometimes exacerbate symptoms.37

Our ancestors consumed soil-based organisms regularly through unwashed produce and environmental contact—exposure modern sanitization has eliminated. Learn more about soil-based organism benefits.

Organic Prebiotics: Feeding Your Beneficial Bacteria

The concept of "synbiotics"—combining probiotics with prebiotics—has gained substantial scientific validation. Prebiotics are specialized plant fibers that resist human digestion but serve as fuel for beneficial gut bacteria, selectively promoting their growth and metabolic activity.38

MicroBiome Restore includes 9 certified organic prebiotics, most notably:

Jerusalem Artichoke Inulin: The Bifidobacterium Booster

Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) contains 16-20% inulin by fresh weight—comparable to chicory root. This fructan-type prebiotic has been extensively studied for its effects on gut microbiota:39

  • A 2010 human intervention study found that fruit and vegetable shots containing 5g/day Jerusalem artichoke inulin significantly increased Bifidobacteria levels (10.0 log10 cells/g feces vs. baseline) and Lactobacillus/Enterococcus populations.40
  • In vitro studies demonstrated that inulin from Jerusalem artichoke enhanced the survival of L. paracasei and L. plantarum strains after simulated gastrointestinal conditions, improving both growth and adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells.41
  • Mouse models show Jerusalem artichoke consumption decreases cecal pH and increases short-chain fatty acid production (acetate, propionate, butyrate) similarly to commercial inulin products.42
Why Organic Matters: Conventional agriculture often uses glyphosate-based herbicides that research suggests may disrupt the gut microbiome. Certified organic prebiotics eliminate this concern, ensuring the food you provide your gut bacteria is as clean as the bacteria themselves.

Additional Prebiotic Components

Beyond Jerusalem artichoke, MicroBiome Restore includes complementary prebiotic fibers:

  • Acacia senegal (gum arabic): A soluble fiber that increases Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus while producing SCFAs, particularly beneficial for sensitive digestive systems.43
  • Dandelion root: Contains inulin and acts as a gentle liver support herb with documented prebiotic effects.44
  • Burdock root: Traditional medicine ingredient with prebiotic oligosaccharides and antioxidant properties.45
  • Bladderwrack: Seaweed providing unique polysaccharides that support diverse microbiome populations.46

Fermented Capsule Technology: Protection Without Compromise

Even the most scientifically formulated probiotic blend is ineffective if the bacteria don't survive transit through the hostile gastric environment. Traditional approaches include:

  • Enteric coating: Often contains synthetic polymers and may not dissolve at optimal intestinal locations
  • High CFU counts: Compensates for die-off but doesn't address the root problem
  • Freeze-drying alone: Improves stability but offers no active gastric protection

MicroBiome Restore employs fermented pullulan capsules—a next-generation delivery system with multiple advantages:

What Makes Pullulan Superior

pullulan vs mcc hypromellose capsules

🔬 Better Oxygen Barrier

Pullulan exhibits 2-3× better oxygen barrier properties than HPMC (hypromellose), protecting oxygen-sensitive anaerobic strains like Bifidobacterium species.47

🎯 Targeted Release

Acid-resistant properties ensure capsules remain intact through stomach pH 2.0, only dissolving at intestinal pH >5.5 where probiotics can colonize.48

🌱 Prebiotic Potential

Unlike inert HPMC, pullulan can be fermented by gut bacteria into beneficial SCFAs, providing nutritional support to the probiotics being delivered.49,50

✅ 90%+ Viability

Research shows pullulan capsules achieve >90% probiotic survival through simulated digestion, compared to 70-80% for HPMC and 50-60% for gelatin.51

A 2019 study in Frontiers in Microbiology demonstrated that pullulan nanoparticles function as effective prebiotics, selectively enhancing Lactobacillus plantarum growth and antibacterial activity.52 This dual function—protecting probiotics during transit while simultaneously supporting them upon arrival—represents a significant advancement over conventional capsule materials. Learn more about why we chose pullulan over hypromellose.

MicroBiome Restore Probiotic Infographic with Fermented pullulan prebiotic capsule illustration of Benefits

Beyond Gut Health: Whole-Body Benefits of a Balanced Microbiome

While digestive comfort remains the primary reason most people seek probiotics, research increasingly reveals that microbiome health influences virtually every bodily system. The gut-brain axis, gut-skin axis, and gut-immune connection represent just a few of the pathways through which our intestinal bacteria communicate with distant organs.

Immune System Regulation

Approximately 70-80% of immune tissue resides in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). Multi-strain probiotics help "train" the immune system to distinguish between harmless antigens and genuine threats, potentially reducing:

  • Autoimmune disease severity53
  • Allergic sensitization54
  • Inflammatory cytokine production55
  • Susceptibility to respiratory infections56

A 2018 clinical trial in type 2 diabetes patients found that 6 months of multi-strain probiotic supplementation (Ecologic® Barrier) decreased circulating endotoxin levels by 70%, TNF-α by 67%, IL-6 by 77%, and C-reactive protein by 53%—demonstrating profound systemic anti-inflammatory effects.57

Mental Health & Cognitive Function

The gut-brain axis facilitates bidirectional communication via the vagus nerve, immune signaling, and microbial metabolites. Emerging research suggests probiotics may influence:

  • Mood regulation: Lactobacillus rhamnosus has shown promise in reducing anxiety and depression scores in human trials58
  • Stress resilience: Bifidobacterium longum reduces cortisol responses to psychological stress59
  • Neurotransmitter production: Certain strains synthesize GABA, serotonin precursors, and other neuroactive compounds60

Metabolic Health & Weight Management

Gut bacteria influence how we extract energy from food, regulate appetite hormones, and store fat. Research on multi-strain probiotics shows promise for:

  • Body composition: A 2022 study found multi-strain probiotics reshaped obesity-related gut dysbiosis and improved lipid profiles in obese children61
  • Insulin sensitivity: Multiple trials demonstrate improvements in HOMA-IR scores with probiotic supplementation62
  • Sugar cravings: Lactobacillus gasseri may help reduce abdominal fat and regulate appetite63

Skin Health From Within

The gut-skin axis explains why many dermatological conditions—eczema, acne, rosacea, psoriasis—often improve with probiotic supplementation. Mechanisms include:

  • Reduced systemic inflammation affecting skin tissue64
  • Enhanced intestinal barrier function preventing antigen translocation65
  • Modulation of skin microbiome via systemic immune effects66

Learn more about how probiotics improve skin health through the gut-skin connection.

Clean Formula: What MicroBiome Restore Doesn't Contain

Understanding what's not in a supplement can be as important as what is included. MicroBiome Restore maintains uncompromising purity standards:

Problematic Additive Why It's Excluded The MicroBiome Restore Alternative
Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC) Non-fermentable filler that provides no nutritional value; may interfere with probiotic adhesion and moisture balance67 Fermented pullulan capsules that actively support probiotic delivery and colonization
Magnesium Stearate Flow agent that research suggests may reduce nutrient absorption and potentially suppress immune T-cell function68 Clean manufacturing processes requiring no flow agents—learn why we're magnesium stearate-free
Silicon Dioxide Anti-caking agent with potential nanoparticle concerns for gut barrier integrity69 Organic prebiotic powders with natural flow characteristics
Titanium Dioxide Coloring agent banned in foods by EU due to genotoxicity concerns70 No artificial colors—capsules and contents derive color from natural fermentation
Artificial Preservatives May disrupt gut microbiome diversity and promote dysbiosis71 Shelf-stable formulation through strain selection and capsule technology

For a comprehensive guide to identifying problematic additives in supplements, see our article on the truth about flow agents and fillers.

Shelf-Stability: Convenience Without Compromise

Many consumers assume probiotics must be refrigerated to maintain viability. While this holds true for some strains and formulations, MicroBiome Restore achieves shelf-stability through strategic design rather than cold-chain dependence.

How We Achieve Room Temperature Stability

  1. Strain selection: Inclusion of naturally hardy Bacillus spores and carefully selected Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium strains bred for stability72
  2. Moisture control: Advanced desiccation techniques and moisture-resistant packaging prevent premature activation73
  3. Protective encapsulation: Pullulan capsules provide superior oxygen barrier compared to conventional materials74
  4. Overages: Formulation includes bacterial counts exceeding label claims to ensure potency through expiration date75
Research Validation: A 2024 study on multiple-unit probiotic tablets found that proper formulation with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and protective coatings achieved remarkable storage stability under ambient conditions, with minimal CFU loss over 6 months.76 MicroBiome Restore's pullulan-based system offers similar stability with superior prebiotic benefits.

This shelf-stability means:

  • ✅ No refrigeration required during shipping or storage
  • ✅ Ideal for travel—maintain your gut health routine anywhere
  • ✅ Full potency guaranteed through printed expiration date
  • ✅ Reduced environmental impact (no cold-chain logistics)

Clinical Applications: Who Benefits Most From Multi-Strain, MCC-Free Probiotics?

While everyone can benefit from supporting their gut microbiome, certain populations and conditions show particularly strong responses to comprehensive multi-strain formulations:

🤢 IBS & Functional Digestive Disorders

Clinical trials consistently show 20-40% symptom reduction with multi-strain probiotics. The 14-strain Bio-Kult® study demonstrated 69% abdominal pain reduction vs. 47% placebo.77 Learn about IBS-specific protocols.

💊 Post-Antibiotic Recovery

Antibiotics devastate gut diversity. Multi-strain + prebiotic combinations accelerate microbiome restoration and prevent opportunistic pathogen overgrowth like C. difficile.78

🔥 Inflammatory Conditions

Multi-strain probiotics reduce systemic inflammation markers (CRP, TNF-α, IL-6) by 50-70% in clinical trials, benefiting conditions from IBD to metabolic syndrome.79

🩺 SIBO Management

Soil-based organisms like Bacillus species help manage small intestinal bacterial overgrowth without exacerbating symptoms, unlike some traditional Lactobacillus strains.80

🏃 Athletes & Active Individuals

Exercise-induced gut permeability ("leaky gut") responds to probiotic intervention. Enhanced immunity reduces respiratory infection risk during training.81

👴 Elderly Populations

Age-related microbiome decline contributes to frailty, constipation, and immune senescence. Multi-strain probiotics improve bowel function and vitamin B12 status.82

Optimal Usage: Maximizing Your Probiotic Investment

To extract maximum benefit from MicroBiome Restore or any quality multi-strain probiotic:

Timing & Dosage

  • Consistency matters most: Daily intake supports stable colonization better than sporadic high-dose usage
  • With meals is ideal: Food buffers stomach acid, improving bacterial survival (though MicroBiome Restore's pullulan capsules minimize this concern)
  • Morning or evening: Choose based on personal routine—adherence beats optimization
  • Avoid extreme heat: While shelf-stable, avoid prolonged exposure to temperatures >77°F (25°C)

For detailed guidance, see our comprehensive article on the best time to take probiotics.

Dietary Synergies

Probiotics work best alongside a gut-nourishing diet:

  • Prebiotic-rich foods: Onions, garlic, asparagus, bananas, oats feed beneficial bacteria—learn about natural prebiotic sources
  • Fermented foods: Yogurt, kefir, sauerkraut, kimchi provide complementary beneficial bacteria
  • Polyphenols: Colorful fruits and vegetables promote microbial diversity
  • Adequate fiber: 25-35g daily supports SCFA production and healthy transit time

Conversely, minimize:

  • Artificial sweeteners (may disrupt microbiome composition)83
  • Excessive alcohol (damages intestinal lining)
  • Ultra-processed foods (associated with reduced microbial diversity)
  • Unnecessary antibiotics (use only when medically essential)

Complementary Supplementation

For comprehensive gut restoration, consider the Gut Essentials Protocol, which combines MicroBiome Restore with X-Cellerator Full Spectrum Minerals. Trace minerals serve as cofactors for hundreds of enzymes involved in:

  • Digestive enzyme production84
  • Intestinal barrier maintenance85
  • Immune function regulation86
  • Probiotic metabolic activity87

Learn more about trace minerals for gut health and enhancing probiotic effectiveness.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long until I notice results?

Individual responses vary, but research suggests a typical timeline:

  • 1-2 weeks: Initial changes in bowel regularity, bloating reduction
  • 4-6 weeks: Measurable improvements in IBS symptoms, immune markers
  • 8-12 weeks: Optimal microbiome remodeling, metabolic changes
  • 3-6 months: Maximum benefits for complex conditions like leaky gut, chronic inflammation

Some users report improvements within days, particularly for acute digestive discomfort. Consistency is key—benefits compound over time.88

Can I take probiotics with antibiotics?

Yes, and research strongly supports this practice. Take probiotics:

  • At least 2-3 hours separated from antibiotic doses
  • Throughout the antibiotic course
  • Continue for at least 2-4 weeks after completing antibiotics

Meta-analyses show this approach reduces antibiotic-associated diarrhea risk by 50%+ and helps prevent C. difficile infections.89 MicroBiome Restore's inclusion of antibiotic-resistant Bacillus spores makes it particularly suitable for concurrent use.

Are there any side effects?

Multi-strain probiotics have an exceptional safety profile. Potential mild, transient effects may include:

  • Temporary gas or bloating (typically resolves within 1-2 weeks as microbiome adjusts)
  • Changes in bowel frequency (generally normalizing)
  • Mild digestive gurgling (signs of microbial activity)

These represent adjustment responses, not adverse reactions. To minimize:

  • Start with half-dose for first 3-5 days, then increase to full dose
  • Take with substantial meals initially
  • Ensure adequate hydration and dietary fiber

Serious adverse events are extraordinarily rare. Those with compromised immune systems or critically ill should consult physicians before any probiotic use.90

How does MicroBiome Restore compare to other brands?

Feature MicroBiome Restore Typical Retail Brands
Strain Count 26 diverse strains 1-10 strains (often same genus)
Soil-Based Organisms 5 Bacillus species included Rarely included
Prebiotic Content 9 organic prebiotics Often none or synthetic inulin
Capsule Technology Fermented pullulan (prebiotic) HPMC or gelatin (inert)
Problematic Fillers Zero—no MCC, stearates, silica Commonly contain MCC, Mg stearate
Refrigeration Required No—shelf-stable Often yes
Certified Organic Ingredients Yes—prebiotics are USDA certified Rarely

For an in-depth comparison, read MicroBiome Restore vs. MCC-containing supplements.

Ready to Experience the Multi-Strain, MCC-Free Difference?

Join thousands who've transformed their gut health with science-backed, filler-free probiotic supplementation.

Shop MicroBiome Restore Now

Free shipping on orders over $50 | 60-day satisfaction guarantee

Conclusion: The Future of Probiotic Supplementation

The evidence is clear: multi-strain probiotic formulations free from microcrystalline cellulose and other problematic fillers consistently outperform conventional alternatives across multiple measures—colonization efficiency, clinical symptom reduction, microbiome diversity enhancement, and systemic health markers.

MicroBiome Restore represents the convergence of cutting-edge microbiome science with uncompromising formulation integrity:

  • ✅ 26 synergistic strains spanning seven bacterial genera for comprehensive coverage
  • ✅ Zero MCC, magnesium stearate, or flow agents—just pure, effective ingredients
  • ✅ 5 soil-based organisms for superior gastric survival and colonization
  • ✅ 9 prebiotics providing nutritional support for probiotic establishment
  • ✅ Fermented pullulan capsules offering 90%+ viability plus prebiotic benefits
  • ✅ Shelf-stable formulation for convenient daily use anywhere
  • ✅ Clinical research-backed strain selection and dosing

Your gut health is foundational to overall wellness—it deserves a supplement designed without compromise. Whether you're managing IBS symptoms, recovering from antibiotics, optimizing athletic performance, or simply investing in long-term health, the choice is clear.

Discover what comprehensive, clean-label probiotic supplementation can do for you. Explore our full range of gut health solutions:

For ongoing gut health education, explore our Gut Check blog featuring evidence-based articles on microbiome optimization, strain-specific benefits, and holistic digestive wellness strategies.

References

  1. Madempudi RS, et al. Randomized clinical trial: the effect of probiotic Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 vs. placebo on the symptoms management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12210. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48554-x View Source
  2. Hod K, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of a probiotic mixture on symptoms and inflammatory markers in women with diarrhea-predominant IBS. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(11):e13037. doi:10.1111/nmo.13037 View Source
  3. Paseephol T, et al. Evaluation of Jerusalem artichoke inulin powder for functional food applications. Food Chem. 2008;109(4):876-882. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.012 View Source
  4. Stenman LK, et al. Probiotic With or Without Fiber Controls Body Fat Mass, Associated With Serum Zonulin, in Overweight and Obese Adults. EBioMedicine. 2016;13:190-200. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.036 View Source
  5. Yang J, et al. Enhancing the prebiotic effect of cellulose biopolymer in the gut by physical structuring via particle size manipulation. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2020;71(3):318-329. doi:10.1080/09637486.2019.1650004 View Source
  6. Cutting SM. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol. 2011;28(2):214-220. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.007 View Source
  7. McFarlin BK, et al. Oral spore-based probiotic supplementation was associated with reduced incidence of post-prandial dietary endotoxin, triglycerides, and disease risk biomarkers. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2017;8(3):117-126. doi:10.4291/wjgp.v8.i3.117 View Source
  8. Kleessen B, et al. Jerusalem artichoke and chicory inulin in bakery products affect faecal microbiota of healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr. 2007;98(3):540-549. doi:10.1017/S0007114507732498 View Source
  9. Kolida S, Gibson GR. Prebiotic capacity of inulin-type fructans. J Nutr. 2007;137(11 Suppl):2503S-2506S. doi:10.1093/jn/137.11.2503S View Source
  10. Chassard C, et al. The cellulose-degrading microbial community of the human gut varies according to the presence or absence of methanogens. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;74(1):205-213. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00941.x View Source
  11. Deehan EC, et al. Elucidating the role of the gut microbiota in the physiological effects of dietary fiber. Microbiome. 2022;10:77. doi:10.1186/s40168-022-01248-5 View Source
  12. Minekus M. The TNO Gastro-Intestinal Model (TIM). In: Verhoeckx K, et al., editors. The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 37-46. View Source
  13. Li XY, et al. Moisture sorption characteristics of microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(5):1135-1144. doi:10.1002/jps.20330 View Source
  14. Boateng JS, et al. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(8):2892-2923. doi:10.1002/jps.21210 View Source
  15. Wong JM, et al. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(3):235-243. doi:10.1097/00004836-200603000-00015 View Source
  16. Robert C, Bernalier-Donadille A. The cellulolytic microflora of the human colon: evidence of microcrystalline cellulose-degrading bacteria in methane-excreting subjects. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;46(1):81-89. doi:10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00207-1 View Source
  17. Sender R, et al. Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(8):e1002533. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533 View Source
  18. Markowiak-Kopeć P, Śliżewska K. The Effect of Probiotics on the Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids by Human Intestinal Microbiome. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1107. doi:10.3390/nu12041107 View Source
  19. Lakhtin M, et al. Multi-strain probiotics: anti-tumor and anti-infectious potential. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:27597. doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.27597 View Source
  20. Timmerman HM, et al. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics—A comparison of functionality and efficacy. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;96(3):219-233. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012 View Source
  21. Duncan SH, et al. The role of pH in determining the species composition of the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(8):2112-2122. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01931.x View Source
  22. Bermudez-Brito M, et al. Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;61(2):160-174. doi:10.1159/000342079 View Source
  23. Wilkins T, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of a multi-strain probiotic formulation in the management of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):71. doi:10.1186/s12876-018-0788-9 View Source
  24. McFarland LV, et al. Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65(5):1352-1365. doi:10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z View Source
  25. Ford AC, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(10):1044-1060. doi:10.1111/apt.15001 View Source
  26. Mazlyn MM, et al. The effect of multistrain probiotics on functional constipation in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76(12):1710-1717. doi:10.1038/s41430-022-01189-0 View Source
  27. Khalili L, et al. Effects of a 6-month multi-strain probiotics supplementation in endotoxemic, inflammatory and cardiometabolic status of T2DM patients. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(4):1548-1556. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.015 View Source
  28. Ouwehand AC, et al. Effectiveness of Multistrain Versus Single-strain Probiotics: Current Status and Recommendations for the Future. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52 Suppl 1:S35-S40. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001052 View Source
  29. Turroni F, et al. Bifidobacteria and the infant gut: an example of co-evolution and natural selection. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(1):103-118. doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2672-0 View Source
  30. Fijan S. Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: an overview of recent literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(5):4745-4767. doi:10.3390/ijerph110504745 View Source
  31. Million M, et al. Obesity-associated gut microbiota is enriched in Lactobacillus reuteri and depleted in Bifidobacterium animalis and Methanobrevibacter smithii. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(6):817-825. doi:10.1038/ijo.2011.153 View Source
  32. Elshaghabee FMF, et al. Bacillus As Potential Probiotics: Status, Concerns, and Future Perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1490. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01490 View Source
  33. Franz CM, et al. Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;151(2):125-140. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.014 View Source
  34. Casula G, Cutting SM. Bacillus probiotics: spore germination in the gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(5):2344-2352. doi:10.1128/AEM.68.5.2344-2352.2002 View Source
  35. Guo X, et al. Spore-forming probiotics: an overview. Food Biosci. 2020;38:100797. doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100797 View Source
  36. Piewngam P, et al. Pathogen elimination by probiotic Bacillus via signalling interference. Nature. 2018;562(7728):532-537. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0616-y View Source
  37. Zhong C, et al. Probiotics for Preventing and Treating Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Current Evidence. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(4):300-311. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000814 View Source
  38. Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. 1995;125(6):1401-1412. doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 View Source
  39. Saengkanuk A, et al. Functional ingredients from Jerusalem artichoke tubers. Asian J Food Agro-Industry. 2011;4(1):1-11. View Source
  40. Kleessen B, et al. Prebiotic effect of fruit and vegetable shots containing Jerusalem artichoke inulin: a human intervention study. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(12):1793-1801. doi:10.1017/S000711451000253X View Source
  41. Charalampopoulos D, et al. Influence of inulin rich carbohydrates from Jerusalem artichoke on probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2019;98:554-562. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.023 View Source
  42. Saito Y, et al. Combinatorial Effects of Soluble, Insoluble, and Organic Extracts from Jerusalem Artichokes on Gut Microbiota in Mice. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):954. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8070954 View Source
  43. Cherbut C, et al. Acacia Gum is a Bifidogenic Dietary Fibre with High Digestive Tolerance in Healthy Humans. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2003;15(1):43-50. doi:10.1080/08910600310014377 View Source
  44. Martinez M, et al. The effect of dandelion root as a prebiotic substance on human faecal microbiota. Phytother Res. 2015;29(5):674-691. doi:10.1002/ptr.5294 View Source
  45. Chan YS, et al. A review on the beneficial effects of burdock root. J Nutr Health Sci. 2011;2(1):101-108. View Source
  46. Ale MT, Meyer AS. Fucoidans from brown seaweeds: an update on structures, extraction techniques and use of enzymes as tools for structural elucidation. RSC Adv. 2013;3(19):8131-8141. doi:10.1039/C3RA23373A View Source
  47. Krochta JM. Proteins as raw materials for films and coatings: definitions, current status, and opportunities. In: Gennadios A, editor. Protein-based films and coatings. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002. p. 1-41. View Source
  48. Shukla R, Cheryan M. Performance of ultrafiltration membranes in ethanol-water solutions: effect of membrane conditioning. J Membr Sci. 2002;198(1):75-85. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00628-5 View Source
  49. Singh RS, et al. Pullulan: Microbial sources, production and applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;73(4):515-531. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.01.003 View Source
  50. Wu FC, et al. The Effect of Pullulan on the Growth and Acidifying Activity of Selected Stool Microflora. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2017;18(1):85-89. doi:10.2174/1389201017666161111150814 View Source
  51. Burgain J, et al. Encapsulation of probiotic living cells: From laboratory scale to industrial applications. J Food Eng. 2011;104(4):467-483. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.031 View Source
  52. Wang K, et al. Pullulan Nanoparticles as Prebiotics Enhance the Antibacterial Properties of Lactobacillus plantarum Through the Induction of Mild Stress. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:142. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00142 View Source
  53. Dolpady J, et al. Oral Probiotic VSL#3 Prevents Autoimmune Diabetes in NOD Mice by Modulating the Balance Between Regulatory and Pathogenic T Cells. Diabetologia. 2016;59(6):1259-1267. doi:10.1007/s00125-016-3933-8 View Source
  54. Wickens K, et al. A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(4):788-794. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.011 View Source
  55. Lamprecht M, Frauwallner A. Exercise, Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction and Probiotic Supplementation. Med Sport Sci. 2012;59:47-56. doi:10.1159/000341943 View Source
  56. King S, et al. Effectiveness of probiotics on the duration of illness in healthy children and adults who develop common acute respiratory infectious conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(1):41-54. doi:10.1017/S0007114514000075 View Source
  57. Khalili L, et al. The Effects of Lactobacillus casei on Glycemic Response, Serum Sirtuin1 and Fetuin-A Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Iran Biomed J. 2018;22(5):337-342. doi:10.29252/ibj.22.5.337 View Source
  58. Messaoudi M, et al. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2011;105(5):755-764. doi:10.1017/S0007114510004319 View Source
  59. Allen AP, et al. Bifidobacterium longum 1714 as a translational psychobiotic: modulation of stress, electrophysiology and neurocognition in healthy volunteers. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6(11):e939. doi:10.1038/tp.2016.191 View Source
  60. Strandwitz P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018;1693(Pt B):128-133. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.015 View Source
  61. Chen LH, et al. A multi-strain probiotic blend reshaped obesity-related gut dysbiosis and improved lipid metabolism in obese children. Front Nutr. 2022;9:922993. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.922993 View Source
  62. Lew LC, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum P8 alleviated stress and anxiety while enhancing memory and cognition in stressed adults. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2053-2064. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.09.010 View Source
  63. Kadooka Y, et al. Regulation of abdominal adiposity by probiotics (Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055) in adults with obese tendencies in a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(6):636-643. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.19 View Source
  64. Salem I, et al. The Gut Microbiome as a Major Regulator of the Gut-Skin Axis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1459. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01459 View Source
  65. Foolad N, et al. Effect of nutrient supplementation on atopic dermatitis in children: a systematic review of probiotics, prebiotics, formula, and fatty acids. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(3):350-355. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1495 View Source
  66. Gueniche A, et al. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116 (ST11) inhibits substance P-induced skin inflammation and accelerates skin barrier function recovery in vitro. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20(6):731-737. doi:10.1684/ejd.2010.1108 View Source
  67. Rowe RC, et al. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009. View Source
  68. Suzuki T, et al. Effects of magnesium stearate on gastric emptying and intestinal transit times. Int J Pharm. 1998;165(1):75-82. doi:10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00004-X View Source
  69. Bettini R, et al. Translocation of microparticles and their effect on absorption. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;65:124-137. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2014.09.016 View Source
  70. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2021;19(5):6585. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6585 View Source
  71. Chassaing B, et al. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015;519(7541):92-96. doi:10.1038/nature14232 View Source
  72. Sybesma W, et al. Selection of Lactobacillus strains to improve environmental and industrial applications. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1419. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01419 View Source
  73. Champagne CP, et al. Recommendations for the viability assessment of probiotics as concentrated cultures and in food matrices. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;149(3):185-193. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.07.005 View Source
  74. Anal AK, Singh H. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(5):240-251. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.004 View Source
  75. Mortazavian AM, et al. Principles and methods of microencapsulation of probiotic microorganisms. Iran J Biotechnol. 2007;5(1):1-18. View Source
  76. Han YM, et al. Multiple-unit tablet of probiotic bacteria for improved storage stability, acid tolerability, and in vivo intestinal protective effect. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(3):412. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16030412 View Source
  77. Whorwell PJ, et al. Efficacy of an encapsulated probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(7):1581-1590. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00734.x View Source
  78. Shen NT, et al. Timely Use of Probiotics in Hospitalized Adults Prevents Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review With Meta-Regression Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(8):1889-1900. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.003 View Source
  79. Bordbar S, et al. Effects of a Multi-strain Probiotic Supplement on Inflammatory Markers in Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(13):1369-1378. doi:10.1177/0333102420964310 View Source
  80. Takakura W, Pimentel M. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth and Irritable Bowel Syndrome - An Update. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:664. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00664 View Source
  81. West NP, et al. Probiotic supplementation for respiratory and gastrointestinal illness symptoms in healthy physically active individuals. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(4):581-587. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.002 View Source
  82. Ticinesi A, et al. Aging Gut Microbiota at the Cross-Road between Nutrition, Physical Frailty, and Sarcopenia: Is There a Gut-Muscle Axis? Nutrients. 2017;9(12):1303. doi:10.3390/nu9121303 View Source
  83. Suez J, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 2014;514(7521):181-186. doi:10.1038/nature13793 View Source
  84. Oteiza PI, et al. Zinc and the modulation of redox homeostasis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(9):1748-1759. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.568 View Source
  85. Finamore A, et al. Zinc deficiency induces membrane barrier damage and increases neutrophil transmigration in Caco-2 cells. J Nutr. 2008;138(9):1664-1670. doi:10.1093/jn/138.9.1664 View Source
  86. Prasad AS. Zinc in human health: effect of zinc on immune cells. Mol Med. 2008;14(5-6):353-357. doi:10.2119/2008-00033.Prasad View Source
  87. McCall KA, et al. Function and mechanism of zinc metalloenzymes. J Nutr. 2000;130(5S Suppl):1437S-1446S. doi:10.1093/jn/130.5.1437S View Source
  88. Kristensen NB, et al. Alterations in fecal microbiota composition by probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):52. doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0300-5 View Source
  89. Goldenberg JZ, et al. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;12(12):CD006095. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4 View Source
  90. Boyle RJ, et al. Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6):1256-1264. doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256 View Source
Back to Gut Check